| 000 | 03010nam a22004458i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CR9781009435710 | ||
| 003 | UkCbUP | ||
| 005 | 20260610102051.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 230428s2025||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
| 020 | _a9781009435710 (ebook) | ||
| 020 | _z9781009435697 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | _z9781009435680 (paperback) | ||
| 040 |
_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBC199.A26 _bA49 2025 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a162 _223/eng/20250609 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aAizawa, Kenneth, _d1961- _eauthor _4aut _4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2002113501 _1http://id.loc.gov/rwo/agents/n2002113501 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCompositional abduction and scientific interpretation : _ba granular approach / _cKenneth Aizawa. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2025. |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (xi, 260 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 341 | 0 |
_3PDF _bSingle logical reading order _2onix |
|
| 341 | 0 |
_3PDF _bTable of content navigation _2onix |
|
| 341 | 0 |
_bIndex navigation _2onix |
|
| 500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 21 Nov 2025). | ||
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access. _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
| 520 | _aAbductive reasoning is a form of inference that infers some hypothesis because of what that hypothesis explains. Unlike deductive reasoning, it yields a plausible conclusion but does not definitively verify it. The theory of compositional abduction developed in this book provides a novel theory of confirmation. Aizawa uses case studies to analyse how scientists interpret the results of experiments to support compositional hypotheses (hypotheses about what things are composed of) and suggests that they use a kind of abduction. His theory is offered as an alternative account of scientific reasoning that the logical empiricists would have interpreted as hypothetico-deductive confirmation. It is also an alternative to the Peircean interpretation of the role of abduction in science. It will be valuable to philosophers of science, those working on hypothetico-deductive confirmation, Peirce's view of abduction, inference to the best explanation, and the New Mechanism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. | ||
| 532 | 2 | _aWARNING - Flashing hazard | |
| 532 | 8 | _aLatest accessibility assessment date: 20250723 | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aAbduction (Logic) _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85000116 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aReasoning _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aInference _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85066082 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aScience _xMethodology _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118577 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aScience _xPhilosophy _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118582 |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9781009435697 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009435710 |
| 999 |
_c9948 _d9948 |
||