000 02926nas a22003615i 4500
001 3091-2911
003 DE-He213
005 20260610082532.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150723s||||||||xxuuu poo|||||| b|EN |d
022 _a3091-2911
024 7 _a10.1007/12231.1874-9364
_2doi
210 1 0 _aEthnobot. Econ. Bot.
245 1 0 _aEthnobotany and Economic Botany
_h[electronic resource] :
_bformerly Economic Botany /
_cedited by Ina Vandebroek.
264 1 _aNew York :
_bSpringer US :
_bImprint: Springer.
300 _bonline resource.
520 _aEthnobotany and Economic Botany (formerly known as Economic Botany) is a quarterly journal published by The New York Botanical Garden for the Society for Economic Botany. Interdisciplinary in scope, Ethnobotany and Economic Botany bridges the gap between pure and applied botany by focusing on the uses of plants by people. The foremost publication of its kind in this field, Ethnobotany and Economic Botany documents the rich relationship that has always existed between plants and people around the world, encompassing the past, present, and potential uses of plants. The issues contain original research articles, review articles, book reviews, annotated bibliographies, and notes on economic plants. Ethnobotany and Economic Botany does NOT publish papers that are: Primarily agronomic, anatomical, or horticultural Concerned mainly with analytical data on the chemical constituents of plants About issues of molecular or phylogenetic systematics WITHOUT hypotheses associated with useful plant characteristics Tests of existing taxonomies, even of plants with significant human use Lists of useful plants from some part of the world unless they are the first description of their use in a particular culture or region, but this uniqueness must be specified and characterized in the paper. Even in such a special case, however, such a descriptive paper will require an analysis of the context of use of plants. How is plant use similar to or different from that of other cultures? Why is a particular species or group of species used? Is there a difference in use patterns between native and introduced species, etc. Note that it is not a sufficient justification for publication to report that botanical knowledge is being lost in the region of study.
650 0 _aBotany.
650 0 _aPlants—Evolution.
650 0 _aPlants—Development.
650 0 _aPlant physiology.
650 0 _aPlant ecology.
650 1 4 _aPlant Science.
650 2 4 _aPlant Evolution.
650 2 4 _aPlant Development.
650 2 4 _aPlant Physiology.
650 2 4 _aPlant Ecology.
700 1 _aVandebroek, Ina.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
776 0 8 _iPrinted version:
_x3091-2903
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/12231.1874-9364
_zHybrid
999 _c4348
_d4348