| 000 | 04976nam a22005298i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BRILL9789004457348 | ||
| 003 | nllekb | ||
| 005 | 20260610105604.0 | ||
| 007 | cr un uuuua | ||
| 008 | 230710s1993 gw sb 001 0 eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9789004457348 _q(electronic book) |
||
| 020 |
_z9789051835922 _q(print) |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1163/9789004457348 _2DOI |
|
| 035 | _z(OCoLC)29996617 | ||
| 040 |
_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 050 | 4 | _aBC38 | |
| 072 | 7 |
_aHPL _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aPHI _x011000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a160.904 _223 |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aEmpirical Logic and Public Debate : _bEssays in Honour of Else M. Barth / _cedited by Erik C.W. Krabbe, Renée José Dalitz and Pier A. Smit. |
| 246 | 3 | _aEssays in Honour of Else M. Barth | |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill, _c1993. |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©1993 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (340 pages) : _billustrations. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aPoznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities ; _v35 |
|
| 490 | 1 | _aReligious Studies, Theology and Philosophy - Book Archive pre-2000 | |
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 |
_tPreliminary Material / _rErik C.W. Krabbe, Renée José Dalitz, and Pier A. Smit -- Introduction / _rErik C.W. Krabbe, Renée José Dalitz, and Pier A. Smit -- Chapter 1 Needing Each other for Knowledge: Reflections on Trust and Testimony / _rTrudy Govier -- Chapter 2 Secundum Quid as A Research Programme / _rJohn Woods -- Chapter 3 On The Fourfold Root of The Argumentum Ad Hominem / _rGabriël Nuchelmans -- Chapter 4 The History of The Argumentum Ad Hominem Since The Seventeenth Century / _rFrans H. van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst -- Chapter 5 Debate in A Bermuda Triangle of Medical Ethics / _rL. Sara van Epenhuysen -- Chapter 6 Reasonable Argument and Fallacies in The Kok-Stekelenburg Debate / _rErik C.W. Krabbe -- Chapter 7 Some Weak Links in The Great Chain of Being / _rJohn D. North -- Chapter 8 ‘You Assert This?’ An Empirical Study of Weight-Expressions / _rArne Næss -- Chapter 9 Gerrit Mannoury on The Communicative Functions of Negation in Ordinary Language / _rRob Wiche -- Chapter 10 Default and Dogma / _rJaap Hoepelman and Toine van Hoof -- Chapter 11 On The Logic of Nonmoral Commitment / _rCharles Goossens -- Chapter 12 Arguments Founded on Creative Definitions / _rWitold Marciszewski -- Chapter 13 Cognitive Science and Connectionism: Friend and Enemy or Move and Counter-Move, an Application of Empirical Logic / _rRené Jorna -- Chapter 14 Dialectical Fields and Manifest Rationality / _rRalph H. Johnson -- Chapter 15 Reason Which Cannot be Reasoned With; What is Public Debate and How Does it Change? / _rPeter du Preez -- Chapter 16 Logic, Democracy, and Mosca / _rMaurice A. Finocchiaro -- Chapter 17 The Logic of Virtue and Terror / _rPier A. Smit -- Chapter 18 On Obstacles to Public Debate / _rGodfried van Benthem van den Bergh -- Chapter 19 Real-Life Mathematics Versus Ideal Mathematics: The Ugly Truth / _rJean Paul Van Bendegem -- Chapter 20 The Road of Being and The Exclusion of The Feminine / _rVigdis Songe-Møller -- Chapter 21 The Subjection of Women in The Contractual Society / _rRenée José Dalitz -- Chapter 22 Anti-Semitism and Anti-Feminism Again: The Dissemination of Otto Weininger’s Sex and Character in The Seventies and Eighties / _rHannelore Schröder -- Chapter 23 Traditional Spheres and Traditionalist Logic / _rJanet Radcliffe Richards. |
|
| 520 | _aEmpirical Logic and Public Debate supplies a large number of previously unpublished papers that together make up a survey of recent developments in the field of empirical logic. It contains theoretical contributions, some of a more formal and some of an informal nature, as well as numerous contemporary and historical case studies. The book will therefore be attractive both to those who wish to focus upon the theory and practice of discussion, debate, arguing, and argument, as well as to those readers who are primarily interested in applications to a particular field, such as ethics, political philosophy, feminist philosophy, or the history of philosophy. | ||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aDebates and debating. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aEmpiricism. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aLogic, Modern _y20th century. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aDalitz, Renée José, _eeditor. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKrabbe, Erik C.W., _eeditor. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSmit, Pier A., _eeditor. |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _tEmpirical Logic and Public Debate : Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth. _dLeiden ; Boston : Brill, 1993. _z9789051835922 |
| 830 | 0 |
_aPoznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities ; _v35. |
|
| 830 | 0 | _aReligious Studies, Theology and Philosophy - Book Archive pre-2000. | |
| 856 | 4 |
_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004457348 |
|
| 999 |
_c40972 _d40972 |
||