000			03797nam a2200445 i 4500
001			BRILL9789004192058
003			nllekb
005			20260610105541.0
007			cr un uuuua
008			100929s2011 ne sb 001 0 eng
010			_a 2010041733
020			_a9789004192058 _q(electronic book)
020			_z9789004188853 _q(print)
024	7		_a10.1163/ej.9789004188853.i-246 _2DOI
035			_a(OCoLC)667990376 _z(OCoLC)717697956
040			_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda
050		4	_aBC34 _b.M46 2011
082	0	4	_a160.92 _222
245	0	0	_aMethods and methodologies _bAristotelian logic East and West, 500-1500 / _cedited by Margaret Cameron and John Marenbon.
264		1	_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill, _c2011.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aBrill eBook titles 2011
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0	0	_tPreliminary Material / _rM. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- _tMethods And Methodologies: An Introduction / _rMargaret Cameron -- _tThe ‘Ontologization’ Of Logic. Metaphysical Themes In Avicenna’s Reworking Of The Organon / _rAmos Bertolacci -- _tAverroes And The Logical Status Of Metaphysics / _rMatteo Di Giovanni -- _tNon Est Natura Sine Persona. The Issue Of Uninstantiated Universals From Late Antiquity To The Early Middle Ages / _rChristophe Erismann -- _tWhat Counted As Logic In The Thirteenth Century? / _rSten Ebbesen -- _tTwo Summulae, Two Ways Of Doing Logic: Peter Of Spain’s ‘Realism’ And John Buridan’s ‘Nominalism’ / _rGyula Klima -- _tThe Scope Of Logic: Soto And Fonseca On Dialectic And Informal Arguments / _rE. Jennifer Ashworth -- _tInterpreting Medieval Logic And In Medieval Logic / _rSimo Knuuttila -- _tIs There A Medieval Mereology? / _rAndrew Arlig -- _tOn Formalizing The Logics Of The Past / _rPaul Thom -- _tDe Interpretatione 5–8: Aristotle, Boethius, And Abaelard On Propositionality / _rChristopher J. Martin -- _tBibliography / _rM. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- _tIndexes / _rM. Cameron and J. Marenbon.
506	1		_aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520			_aMethods and Methodologies explores two questions about studying the Aristotelian tradition of logic. The first, addressed by the chapters on methods in the first half of the book, is directly about the medieval logical commentaries, treatises and handbooks. How did medieval authors in the different traditions, Latin and Arabic, go about their work on Aristotelian logic? In particular, how did they themselves conceive the relationship between logic and other branches of philosophy and disciplines outside philosophy? The second question is about methodologies, the subject of the chapters in the second half of the book: it invites writers to reflect on their own and their colleagues’ practice as twenty-first century interpreters of this medieval writing on Aristotelian logic. Contributors are Sten Ebbesen, Christopher J. Martin, Christophe Erismann, Andrew Arlig, Simo Knuuttila, Amos Bertolacci, Jennifer Ashworth, Paul Thom, Gyula Klima, Matteo di Giovanni and Margaret Cameron.
600	0	0	_aAristotle _vCongresses.
650		0	_aLogic, Medieval _vCongresses.
650		0	_aMuslim logicians _vCongresses.
700	1		_aCameron, Margaret _q(Margaret Anne)
700	1		_aMarenbon, John.
776	0		_z9789004188853 (hardback : alk. paper) _z9004188851 (hardback : alk. paper) _z9789004192058 (electronic book)
830		0	_aInvestigating Medieval Philosophy _v2.
830		0	_aEuropean History and Culture E-Books Online, Collection 2011, ISBN: 9789004222878.
856	4		_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004188853.i-246
999			_c39665 _d39665