000 02568cam a2200409Ii 4500
001 BRILL9789004339453
003 nllekb
005 20260610105531.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 161114s2016 xx s 000 0 eng d
020 _a9789004339453
_q(electronic book)
020 _z9789004339446
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004339453
_2DOI
035 _a(OCoLC)962553010
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
050 4 _aKZA1145
_b.O84 2016
072 7 _aLBBK
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW066000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a341
245 0 4 _aThe Other Australia / Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute :
_bInferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case.
264 1 _a[S.l.] :
_bBrill Academic Pub,
_c2016.
300 _a1 online resource (vi, 91 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aBrill research perspectives
506 _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520 _aIn 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed anyway because of international courts’ reluctance to consider scientific matters, the dispute's underlying cause being the parties' scientific disagreements regarding both the tuna stock itself and the nature and risks of the experiment. In 2014, however, the ICJ decided in Australia's favour the case against Japan's scientific whaling, based on flaws in the design of that experiment. Reviewing the tuna experiment's evolving design, the propositions it was to (dis)prove and the use Japan intended for that proof, Andrew Serdy suggests that similar factors were at play in both disputes and that a similar outcome of the tuna case, though not inevitable, would have been amply justified.
650 0 _aLaw of the sea.
650 0 _aMarine resources
_zJapan.
650 0 _aMarine resources
_zAustralia.
720 _aSerdy, Andrew.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_tThe Other Australia/Japan Living Marine Resources Dispute: Inferences on the Merits of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Arbitration in Light of the Whaling Case
_dLeiden, Boston : BRILL, 2017,
_z9789004339446
830 0 _aBrill Research Perspectives.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004339453
999 _c39086
_d39086