000 03687nas a22004095i 4500
001 2058-8615
003 DE-He213
005 20260610082522.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 150723s||||||||xxkuu poo|||||| b|EN |d
022 _a2058-8615
024 7 _a41073
_2local
210 1 0 _aRes Integr Peer Rev
245 1 0 _aResearch Integrity and Peer Review
_h[electronic resource] /
_cedited by Frits Rosendaal, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Mario Malički.
264 1 _aLondon :
_bBioMed Central :
_bImprint: BioMed Central.
300 _bonline resource.
520 _aResearch Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of integrity in research publication, including peer review, study reporting, and research and publication ethics. Particular consideration is given to submissions that address current controversies and limitations in the field and offer potential solutions. We welcome research into peer review and editorial decision making, however, reports of individual journal or publisher decisions or actions will not be considered. Research and publication ethics We consider manuscripts on all aspects of research and publication ethics, including, but not limited to, the ethics of research designs, ethical approval, consent, authorship and contributorship, competing interests, and all forms of research and publication misconduct on the part of authors, reviewers, and editors. We also welcome manuscripts focused on the effects of academic reward systems on publication behaviour, journal funding and income sources, and relations between editors and publishers and editorial freedom. Research reporting We consider manuscripts investigating the issues relating to research reporting. Manuscripts evaluating interventions to improve the completeness, accuracy, and usability of research reports, development, evaluation, and implementation of reporting guidelines, prevention of publication bias and selective reporting, and improvement of readability are particularly encouraged. We also welcome studies or constructive discussions on alternatives to academic publishing (such as reporting in research registries) and other novel approaches aimed at increasing the availability, value, and reliability of published research. Peer review We consider manuscripts reporting research into the peer review of articles for publication (by journals), or presentation (by conferences), and the peer review of grant proposals by funders. Research topics include: methods of identifying, training, and rewarding peer reviewers; mechanisms to reduce bias, such as blinding; novel systems for peer review, such as ‘public review’ and post-publication review; and methods to measure and improve the quality of peer review.
650 0 _aScience—Moral and ethical aspects.
650 0 _aEthics.
650 0 _aBioethics.
650 0 _aSocial sciences.
650 0 _aHumanities.
650 0 _aScience—Study and teaching.
650 0 _aMedical education.
650 1 4 _aScience Ethics.
650 2 4 _aMoral Philosophy and Applied Ethics.
650 2 4 _aBioethics.
650 2 4 _aHumanities and Social Sciences.
650 2 4 _aScience Education.
650 2 4 _aMedical Education.
700 1 _aRosendaal, Frits.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 _aMeerpohl, Joerg J.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
700 1 _aMalički, Mario.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
856 4 0 _uhttps://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com
_zOpen Access
999 _c3655
_d3655