| 000 | 05685cam a2200481Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BRILL9789004281172 | ||
| 003 | nllekb | ||
| 005 | 20260610105438.0 | ||
| 007 | cr un uuuua | ||
| 008 | 140722s2014 ne a sb 101 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | _a 2014028942 | ||
| 020 |
_a9789004281172 _q(electronic book) |
||
| 020 |
_z9789004281165 _q(print) |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1163/9789004281172 _2DOI |
|
| 035 |
_a(OCoLC)884242766 _z(OCoLC)889181206 |
||
| 040 |
_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aK2390.A6 _bF66 2014 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aK _2lcco |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLBHT _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLAW006000 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a347/.09 _223 |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aFormalisation and flexibilisation in dispute resolution / _cedited by Joachim Zekoll, Moritz Bälz and Iwo Amelung. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill Nijhoff, _c[2014] |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (xii, 410 pages) : _billustrations (some color) |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _a"This book is part of an interdisciplinary research project based at Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main under the title "Extrajudicial and Judicial Conflict Resolution"... The beginnings of the present volume date back to a conference in Frankfurt (20-21 July 2013) ... in co-operation with Goethe University's Institute for International and European Private and Comparative Law and the Interdisciplinary Center for East-Asia Studies (IZO)" -- Acknowledgements. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_tPreliminary Material -- _tIntroduction: The Changing Face of Dispute Resolution / _rJoachim Zekoll , Moritz Bälz and Iwo Amelung -- _t1 Formalisation of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes: Some Socio-legal Thoughts / _rMichael Palmer -- _t2 The Private in Public, the Public in Private: The Blurring Boundary between Public and Private Dispute Resolution / _rDeborah R. Hensler -- _t3 China’s Dispute-Resolution Mechanisms and Innovation in the Transformation Era / _rYujun Feng and Xiaolong Peng -- _t4 Mediation and the Rule of Law: The Chinese Landscape / _rHualing Fu -- _t5 No Alternative: Resolving Disputes Japanese Style / _rEric A. Feldman -- _t6 Judicial Dispute Resolution and its Many Alternatives: The Nordic Experience / _rPia Letto-Vanamo -- _t7 “Explaining” and “Mediating” is More Important than Penalties: A Comprehensive Explanation of the Resolution of Minor Cases at County Level in Late-Imperial China (1368–1911) / _rJiang Yu -- _t8 The Diversification and Formalisation of ADR in Japan: The Effect of Enacting the Act on Promotion of Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution / _rKota Fukui -- _t9 In/formalisation and Glocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration and Investment Treaty Arbitration in Asia / _rLuke Nottage -- _t10 Informalism and Formalism in the History of ADR in the United States and An Exploration of the Sources, Character, and Implications of Formalism in a Court-sponsored ADR Programme / _rWayne Brazil -- _t11 Unlocking Justice and Markets: The Promise of Consumer ADR / _rChristopher Hodges -- _t12 Private Law Enforcement and ADR: An Arranged Marriage / _rGerhard Wagner -- _tIndex. |
| 506 | _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only. | ||
| 520 | _aFormal law versus informal justice – these are two frequently invoked labels to highlight the distinction between court-based and “alternative” dispute resolution (ADR). Indeed, it appears to be all but a truism to assume that ADR has developed as a more flexible and creative alternative to rigid and formalised judicial proceedings. In Formalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution scholars from four continents examine both historical and recent developments that cast doubt on the validity of these widespread assumptions. They not only explore trends towards an increased formalisation of ADR procedures but also address the tendencies of state civil justice systems to adopt flexible and informal tools for the resolution of disputes in the courts. Editors Joachim Zekoll, Moritz Bälz and Iwo Amelung have divided the book into three Parts. Part One seeks to develop the general theme of formalisation from several angles, including a socio-legal perspective, the public-private divide, the regulatory challenges and potential tensions with the rule of law. The emphasis of Part Two is on the historical emergence of formal and informal dispute resolution instruments in several legal and cultural contexts. Historical roots, be they genuine or construed, also play a role in the other two parts of the book, but in this part, they take centre stage. Finally, Part Three features chapters which address and elaborate on specific applications such as ADR as means of consumer dispute resolution and arbitration in transnational investment disputes. While the contributions to the first two parts of this volume already raise normative questions in some respects, this final part evaluates and passes judgement on the potential merits and deficits of ADR in a variety of specific settings. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aDispute resolution (Law) _vCongresses. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aDispute resolution (Law) _2fast |
|
| 655 | 7 |
_aConference papers and proceedings. _2fast |
|
| 700 | 1 | _aZekoll, Joachim. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aBälz, Moritz. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aAmelung, Iwo. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _tFormalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution _dLeiden, Boston : Brill | Nijhoff, 2015, _z9789004281165 |
| 830 | 0 | _aInternational Law E-Books Online, Collection 2015, ISBN: 9789004287440. | |
| 856 | 4 |
_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004281172 |
|
| 999 |
_c36053 _d36053 |
||