000 02658cam a2200397Ii 4500
001 BRILL9789004340749
003 nllekb
005 20260610105407.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 161114s2016 xx s 000 0 eng d
020 _a9789004340749
_q(electronic book)
020 _z9789004340275
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004340749
_2DOI
035 _a(OCoLC)962552380
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
050 4 _aHG5818
_b.N44 2016
072 7 _aLB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW051000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a341
245 0 4 _aThe Negotiability of Debt in Islamic Finance :
_bAn Analytical and Critical Study.
264 1 _a[S.l.] :
_bBrill Academic Pub,
_c2016.
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
490 0 _aBrill research perspectives
506 _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520 _aThe challenges posed by the non-liquidity and non-diversity of the Islamic debts market make the market an inefficient tool on contributing to Muslim economic growth. Islamic scholars and experts created sukuk as an Islamic debt instrument to avoid riba (usury), but the sukuk market (especially in the Gulf) still struggles with the prohibition of the trade of debt due to the prohibition of the two Fiqh Academies. Trading and securitizing debts should be permitted in Islamic law, with one condition, that the debt should be considered low risk. This new rule, the permissibility of trading debts, is supported by three Islamic legal bases, istishab, qiyas, and maslaha, which are recognized by all four Islamic schools of legal thought. Furthermore, permitting the trading of debts is more consistent with the principles and theories of Islamic law than is forbidding it. It is consistent with the obligations theory that debt is a personal right. It is consistent with the mal (property) theory that debt may be sold according to the three Islamic schools of legal thought, all of which consider debt as property. It is consistent with other modern Islamic financial transactions that are permitted by the two Fiqh Academies, such as tawarruq and murabaha.
650 0 _aSecurities (Islamic law)
650 0 _aDebtor and creditor (Islamic law)
720 _aAlmezeini, Abdulaziz Ahmed.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_tThe Negotiability of Debt in Islamic Finance: An Analytical and Critical Study
_dLeiden, Boston : BRILL, 2016,
_z9789004340275
830 0 _aBrill Research Perspectives.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004340749
999 _c34255
_d34255