000			03633cam a2200481Ii 4500
001			BRILL9789004289475
003			nllekb
005			20260610105359.0
007			cr un uuuua
008			150209s2015 ne sb 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2015005529
020			_a9789004289475 _q(electronic book)
020			_z9789004277885 _q(print)
024	7		_a10.1163/9789004289475 _2DOI
035			_a(OCoLC)903213005 _z(OCoLC)905487169
040			_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda
043			_ae------
050		4	_aKJC390 _b.H37 2015
072		7	_aK _2lcco
072		7	_aLBB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW075000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a340/.11 _223
100	1		_aHarbo, Tor-Inge.
245	1	4	_aThe function of proportionality analysis in European law / _cby Tor-Inge Harbo.
264		1	_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill Nijhoff, _c[2015]
300			_a1 online resource (xvii, 331 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aNijhoff Studies in European Law, _x2210-9765 ; _v8
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 319-329) and index.
505	0	0	_aPreliminary Material -- Introduction -- pa in eu Law -- pa in echr Law -- Conclusions to Part 1 -- uk Courts and pa -- Norwegian Courts and pa -- Conclusions to Part 2 -- pa: Between Rationality and Reasonableness -- pa: Between Substance and Procedure -- pa and the Role of Courts -- pa as a (General) Principle of Law -- pa and the Rule of Law -- Conclusions to Part 3 -- Conclusions with Resolutions -- Bibliography -- Index.
506			_aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520			_aThe proportionality principle has become ever more important in European law and elsewhere. The career of the principle has attracted considerable attention from legal practitioners, legal theorists and political scientists alike, but the debate so far has been quite fragmented. In this new book the author offers a broad and systematic analysis of the proportionality principle. Discussing and comparing proportionality analysis as applied by European courts in part one of the book, the author proceeds to contrast proportionality analysis with alternative assessment schemes. In the third part of the book the author reaches beyond doctrinal reconstructions as he deciphers the functions of proportionality jurisprudence. In view of the various facets of proportionality analysis the author departs from the asserted infringement of a legally protected position by some regulatory act, proceeds to discuss the legitimacy of this intervention and undertakes an analysis of its suitability, appropriateness and necessity. According to the author, the safe grounds of proportionality means-ends rationality do not suffice where the legitimacy of an infringement has to be assessed, where conflicting values have to be “balanced” or where courts engage in a proportionality analysis “stricto sensu”. In the concluding remarks, the author proposes how proportionality analysis may be structured in order to better secure the legitimacy of the analysis.
650		0	_aProportionality in law _zEurope.
650		7	_aProportionality in law. _2fast
651		7	_aEurope. _2fast
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _tThe Function of Proportionality Analysis in European Law _dLeiden, Boston : Brill | Nijhoff, 2015, _z9789004277885
830		0	_aNijhoff Studies in European Union Law _v8.
830		0	_aInternational Law E-Books Online, Collection 2015, ISBN: 9789004287440.
856	4		_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004289475
999			_c33792 _d33792