000 03856cam a2200517Ii 4500
001 BRILL9789004320772
003 nllekb
005 20260610104946.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 920227s1993 ne sb 000 0 fre d
010 _a 92009638
020 _a9789004320772
_q(electronic book)
020 _z9789004096189
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004320772
_2DOI
035 _a(OCoLC)25508634
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
041 0 _afre
_beng
050 4 _aB693.Z7
_bO37 1993
072 7 _aHPCA
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI002000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aHPCA
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI002000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a214/.093
_220
100 1 _aO'Brien, Denis,
_d1936-.
245 1 0 _aThéodicée plotinienne, théodicée gnostique /
_cpar Denis O'Brien.
264 1 _aLeiden ;
_aNew York :
_bE.J. Brill,
_c1993.
300 _a1 online resource (117 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aPhilosophia antiqua,
_x0079-1687 ;
_vv. 57
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 0 _tPreliminary material /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tAVERTISSEMENT /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tINTRODUCTION: PLOTIN POLÉMISTE /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tLA DESCENTE DE L’AME /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tLA GÉNÉRATION DE LA MATIÈRE /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tPÉCHÉ ET GÉNÉRATION /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tGÉNÉRATION ET «ILLUMINATION» /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tCONCLUSIONS: L’AME ET LA MATIÈRE /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tL’AME ET LA MATIÈRE : PROBLÈMES D’INTERPRÉTATION /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tLA MATIÈRE, SON ORIGINE, SA NATURE: ERREURS DANS LA THÈSE DE H.-R. SCHWYZER /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tLES SENS DIVERS DU « MAL » : INCOHÉRENCES DANS LA TERMINOLOGIE DEJ.M. RIST /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tTEXTE GREC ET TRADUCTION FRANÇAISE DES PRINCIPAUX PASSAGES CITÉS DU TRAITÉ « CONTRE LES GNOSTIQUES » (ENNÉADE II 9 [33]) /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tAUTEURS MODERNES /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tAUTEURS ANCIENS /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tINDICATIONS RELATIVES AUX CITATIONS DES ENNÉADES /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tRÉSUMÉ /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tENGLISH SUMMARY: THE THEORY OF EVIL IN PLOTINUS AND THE GNOSTICS /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tDU MÊME AUTEUR /
_rDENIS O’BRIEN --
_tPHILOSOPHIA ANTIQUA /
_rJ. MANSFELD , D.T. RUNIA , W.J. VERDENIUS and J.C.M. van WINDEN.
506 _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520 _aPlotinus' fiercely polemical treatise Against the Gnostics has proved peculiarly resistant to modern methods of criticism. So much so, that historians of philosophy frequently end up attributing to Plotinus himself the very beliefs which Plotinus attempts to demolish in his criticism of the Gnostics. Denis O'Brien attempts to unravel this paradox by showing that, in earlier treatises of the Enneads , Plotinus puts forward a theory of the generation of matter by soul, which he then takes for granted in his attack on the Gnostics. This leads to a wholly new understanding of Plotinus' 'theodicy' and of the way in which Plotinus himself conceived of his relation to the Gnostics. Denis O'Brien's analysis should highlight tired commonplaces and support the view that a consistent and original philosophy underlies the complexities and obscurities of the text of the Enneads .
600 0 0 _6880-01
_aPlotinus.
600 0 7 _aPlotinus.
_2fast
650 0 _aTheodicy.
650 7 _aTheodicy.
_2fast
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_tThéodicée plotinienne, théodicée gnostique
_dLeiden, Boston : BRILL, 1993,
_z9789004096189
830 0 _aPhilosophia Antiqua
_v57.
830 0 _aPhilosophia Antiqua Online, ISBN: 9789004319752.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004320772
880 0 4 _6600-01
_aΠλωτίνος,
_d205-270 &#x03B.C@.Χ.
999 _c19128
_d19128