000 02808cam a2200385Ii 4500
001 BRILL9789004386389
003 nllekb
005 20260610104910.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 181023s2018 ne od eng d
020 _a9789004386389
_q(electronic book)
020 _z9789004386372
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004386389
_2DOI
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
050 4 _aKNQ4610
_b.N47 2018
072 7 _aJPQB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPOL040000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a345.5105
_223
100 1 _aElisa Nesossi; Susan Trevaskes
245 0 0 _aProcedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice.
264 3 1 _aLeiden,
_aBoston:
_bBrill,
_c2018.
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
505 0 0 _aFront Matter -- Copyright page -- Author Biographies -- Procedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice.
520 _aThis review examines the literature on procedural justice and the fair trial over the past two decades in the People’s Republic of China. Part 1 gives a wide-angle view of the key political events and developments that have shaped the experience of procedural justice and the fair trial in contemporary China. It provides a storyline that explains the political environment in which these concepts have developed over time. Part 2 examines how scholars understand the legal structures of the criminal process in relation to China’s political culture. Part 3 presents scholarly views on three enduring problems relating to the fair trial: a presumption of innocence, interrogational torture, and the role of lawyers in the criminal trial process. Procedural justice is a particularly pertinent issue today in China, because Xi Jinping’s yifa zhiguo 依法治国 (governing the nation in accordance with the law) governance platform seeks to embed a greater appreciation for procedural justice in criminal justice decision-making, to correct a politico-legal tradition overwhelmingly focused on substantive justice. Overall, the literature reviewed in this article points to the serious limitations in overcoming the politico-legal barriers to justice reforms that remain intact in the system, despite nearly four decades of constant reform.
650 0 _aCriminal procedure
_zChina.
650 0 _aCriminal justice, Administration of
_zChina.
650 0 _aFair trial
_zChina.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_tProcedural Justice and the Fair Trial in Contemporary Chinese Criminal Justice
_dLeiden, Boston : BRILL, 2018,
_z9789004386372
830 0 _aBrill Research Perspectives.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004386389
999 _c17079
_d17079