000 02435nam a22004211i 4500
001 BRILL9789004448155
003 nllekb
005 20260610104857.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 201130s2021 ne sb 001 0 eng d
020 _a9789004448155
_q(electronic book)
020 _a9789004448148
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004448155
_2DOI
035 _z(OCoLC)1200197925
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
050 4 _aN72.S6
072 7 _aAB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aART
_x028000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a701.03
_223
100 1 _aCondello, Angela,
_eauthor.
245 1 2 _aA Theory of Law and Literature :
_bAcross Two Arts of Compromising /
_cAngela Condello, Tiziano Toracca.
246 3 _aAcross Two Arts of Compromising
264 1 _aLeiden;
_aBoston :
_bBRILL,
_c2021.
300 _a1 online resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aBrill Research Perspectives
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 _aIn the present work, a legal philosopher (Angela Condello) and a literaray scholar (Tiziano Toracca) develop the idea that a comparison between law and literature must be framed starting from the modes in which law and literature function . In this sense, they read law and literature as arts of compromising characterized by an analogous and yet, at the same time, profoundly different structure. Both, in fact, mediate conflicts between norms and transgressions, and more precisely between a principle of normativity (repression), on the one hand; and a principle of counternormativity (repressed), on the other hand. Through a progression in three steps, aimed at clarifying some peculiarities of law (1) and literature (2), by referring to examples of their interaction (3), the authors finally sketch some relevant hypotheses on why a placement across these two arts of compromising suggests some theoretical itineraries on their threshold.
588 _aDescription based on print version record.
650 0 _aArt and history.
700 1 _aToracca, Tiziano,
_eauthor.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_tA Theory of Law and Literature : Across Two Arts of Compromising,
_dLeiden ; Boston : BRILL, 2021
_z9789004448148
830 0 _aBrill Research Perspectives.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004448155
999 _c16350
_d16350