000			03424nam a2200469 i 4500
001			BRILL9789004310315
003			nllekb
005			20260610104848.0
007			cr un uuuua
008			151118s2016 mau sb 000 0 eng d
010			_a 2015045722
020			_a9789004310315 _q(electronic book)
020			_z9789004310308 _q(print)
024	7		_a10.1163/9789004310315 _2DOI
040			_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda
050		4	_aBT810.3
072		7	_aHB _2bicssc
072		7	_aHIS000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a233/.7 _223
245	0	0	_aDivine causality and human free choice : _bDomingo Banez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited / _cedited by R.J. Matava.
264		1	_aBoston : _bBrill, _c2016.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aBrill's studies in intellectual history, _x0920-8607 ; _vv. 252
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0	0	_tPreliminary Material / _rR.J. Matava -- _tPrologue / _rR.J. Matava -- _t1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis / _rR.J. Matava -- _t2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice / _rR.J. Matava -- _t3 Domingo Báñez’s Critique of Molina / _rR.J. Matava -- _t4 Luis de Molina’s Critique of Báñez / _rR.J. Matava -- _t5 Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan / _rR.J. Matava -- _t6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas / _rR.J. Matava -- _t7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense / _rR.J. Matava -- _tEpilogue / _rR.J. Matava -- _tSelect Bibliography / _rR.J. Matava -- _tIndex / _rR.J. Matava.
506			_aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520			_aIn Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez’s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.
588			_aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
600	1	0	_aBáñez, Domingo, _d1528-1604.
610	2	0	_aCatholic Church _xDoctrines _xHistory.
650		0	_aFree will and determinism _xReligious aspects _xCatholic Church.
650		0	_aMolinism.
700	1		_aMatava, R. J.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _tDivine causality and human free choice _dBoston : Brill, 2016 _z9789004310308 _w(DLC) 2015042962
830		0	_aBrill's Studies in Intellectual History _v252.
830		0	_aBrill's Studies in Intellectual History Online, Supplement 2016, ISBN: 9789004309685.
856	4		_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310315
999			_c15796 _d15796