| 000 | 03263nam a2200517 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BRILL9789004218826 | ||
| 003 | nllekb | ||
| 005 | 20260610104839.0 | ||
| 007 | cr un uuuua | ||
| 008 | 110908s2012 ne sb 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | _z 2011037676 | ||
| 020 |
_a9789004218826 _q(electronic book) |
||
| 020 |
_z9789004217225 _q(print) |
||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1163/9789004218826 _2DOI |
|
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)774290469 | ||
| 040 |
_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aBS476 _b.H395 2012 |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL _x040040 _2bisacsh |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aHRCG _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aREL _x006400 _2bisacsh |
|
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a296.1/55 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aHeger, Paul, _d1924- |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aChallenges to conventional opinions on Qumran and Enoch issues / _cby Paul Heger. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aLeiden ; _aBoston : _bBrill, _c2012. |
|
| 300 | _a1 online resource (xii, 415 pages) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aStudies on the texts of the desert of Judah, _x0169-9962 ; _vv. 100 |
|
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 | _aPreliminary Material -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Rabbinic and Qumran Interpretation Systems -- 3.The Attribution ofModern Concepts to Authors and Readers of Ancient Texts -- 4. Enoch: Complementary or Alternative toMosaic Torah? -- 5. Jubilees and theMosaic Torah -- 6. Another Look at Dualism in QumranWritings -- 7. Against aTheory of Dual Determinism in 1QS and 1QHa -- 8. Epilogue -- Bibliography -- Index of Citations -- Index of Subjects. |
| 506 | _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only. | ||
| 520 | _aSome literary expressions in the Dead Sea Scrolls led scholars to allege that their authors professed a dualistic and deterministic worldview of Zoroastrian origin and that the omission of Moses and Sinai from the Enoch writings evinces that a segment in Jewish society marginalized the Torah, adopting Enoch’s prophecies as its ethical guideline. This study challenges these allegations as utterly conflicting with essential biblical doctrines and the unequivocal beliefs and expectations of Qumran’s Torah-centered society, arguing that scholars’ allegations are erroneously based on interpreting ancient texts with a modern mindset and influenced by the interpreter’s personal cultural background. The study interprets the relevant texts in a manner compatible with the presumed doctrines of ancient Jewish authors and readers. | ||
| 630 | 0 | 0 |
_aBible. _pO.T. _xHermeneutics _vComparative studies. |
| 630 | 0 | 0 | _aDead Sea scrolls. |
| 630 | 0 | 0 | _aEthiopic book of Enoch. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aRabbinical literature _xHistory and criticism. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aDualism (Religion) _xJudaism. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aJudaism _xHistory _yPost-exilic period, 586 B.C.-210 A.D. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aRELIGION / Judaism / Sacred Writings. _2bisacsh |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _tChallenges to Conventional Opinions on Qumran and Enoch Issues _dLeiden, Boston : BRILL, 2012, _z9789004217225 |
| 830 | 0 |
_aStudies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah _v100. |
|
| 830 | 0 | _aStudies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah Online, ISBN: 9789004378346. | |
| 856 | 4 |
_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004218826 |
|
| 999 |
_c15343 _d15343 |
||