000 03747cam a2200529Ii 4500
001 BRILL9789004288201
003 nllekb
005 20260610104818.0
007 cr un uuuua
008 150210s2015 ne a sb 001 0 eng d
020 _a9789004288201
_q(electronic book)
020 _z9789004288195
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1163/9789004288201
_2DOI
035 _a(OCoLC)903962254
_z(OCoLC)902957708
040 _aNL-LeKB
_cNL-LeKB
_erda
050 4 _aK2100
_b.S798 2015eb
072 7 _aLBHT
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW006000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a346/.092
_223
100 1 _aSourgens, Frédéric Gilles.
245 1 2 _aA nascent common law :
_bthe process of decisionmaking in international legal disputes between states and foreign investors /
_cby Frédéric Gilles Sourgens.
264 1 _aLeiden, The Netherlands :
_bKoninklijke Brill.
264 4 _cc2015.
300 _a1 online resource (426 pages) :
_billustrations.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aInternational Litigation in Practice,
_x1874-0502 ;
_vv. 9
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 0 _aPreliminary Material -- 1 Critical Mass: The Unique Role of Investor-State Arbitration in International Law -- 2 Theoretical Underpinnings of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 3 Stability of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 4 Iura Novit Curia -- 5 The Problem of Jurisdictional Judgment -- 6 Proof of Consent -- 7 Establishment of Jurisdictional Facts -- 8 The Inductive Process of Jurisdictional Decisionmaking -- 9 The Precedent Problem -- 10 Law as Process -- 11 The Common Law Solution -- 12 Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose -- Bibliography -- Index.
506 _aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520 _aIn A Nascent Common Law: The Process of Decisionmaking in International Legal Disputes Between States and Foreign Investors Frédéric Gilles Sourgens submits that investor-state dispute resolution relies upon an inductive, common law decisionmaking process, which reveals a necessary plurality of first principles within investor-state dispute resolution. Relying upon, amongst others, Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, the book explains how this plurality of first principles does not devolve into arbitrary indeterminacy. A Nascent Common Law provides an alternative account to current theoretical conceptions of investor-state arbitration. It explains that these theories cannot adequately resolve a key empirical challenge: tribunals frequently reach facially inconsistent results on similar questions of law. Sourgens makes an inductive approach, focused on the manner of decisionmaking by tribunals in the context of specific records that can explain this inconsistency.
650 0 _aJudicial process.
650 0 _aCommon law.
650 0 _aJurisdiction (International law)
650 0 _aProcedure (Law)
650 7 _aCommon law.
_2fast
650 7 _aJudicial process.
_2fast
650 7 _aJurisdiction (International law)
_2fast
650 7 _aProcedure (Law)
_2fast
655 0 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aSourgens, Frédéric Gilles.
_tNascent common law : the process of decisionmaking in international legal disputes between states and foreign investors.
_dLeiden, The Netherlands : Koninklijke Brill, ©2015
_hxxviii, 398 pages
_kInternational litigation in practice ; Volume 9
_x1874-0502
_z9789004288195
830 0 _aInternational Litigation in Practice
_v9.
830 0 _aInternational Law E-Books Online, Collection 2015, ISBN: 9789004287440.
856 4 _zDOI:
_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004288201
999 _c14123
_d14123