000			03750nam a2200481 i 4500
001			BRILL9789004311336
003			nllekb
005			20260610104816.0
007			cr un uuuua
008			160217s2016 mau sb 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2016007875
020			_a9789004311336 _q(electronic book)
020			_z9789004311329 _q(print)
024	7		_a10.1163/9789004311336 _2DOI
040			_aNL-LeKB _cNL-LeKB _erda
043			_ae-fr---
050		4	_aBV4160.U57
072		7	_aHB _2bicssc
072		7	_aHIS000000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a230.07/3244361 _223
100	1		_aMoule, Gregory S.
245	1	0	_aCorporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 / _cby Gregory S. Moule.
264		1	_aBoston : _bBrill, _c2016.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aEducation and society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, _x0926-6070 ; _vv. 51
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0	0	_aPreliminary Material -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Early History of the Faculty of Theology: Evidence for the Model of Bishop and Chapter in the Faculty -- 3 The Corporate Development of the Faculty of Theology -- 4 Jurisdiction and the Cathedral Chapter: Gratian and the Decretists -- 5 Jurisdiction of the Cathedral Chapter: Episcopus Nullius and Irrefragabili -- 6 Jurisdiction, Procedure, and the Censure of Academic Heresy in the Faculty of Theology -- 7 The Debate over the Jurisdiction of the Faculty of Theology -- 8 Judas, Monteson, and Fraternal Correction at Paris -- 9 Fraternal Correction and Its Role in Academic Censure at the University of Paris -- Conclusion -- Appendix A -- Select Bibliography -- Index of Legal Citations -- Index of Biblical Citations -- Index of Names and Subjects.
506			_aAvailable to subscribing member institutions only.
520			_aIn Corporate Jurisdiction, Academic Heresy, and Fraternal Correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 , Gregory S. Moule explains how the theological faculty acquired independent jurisdiction over cases of academic heresy among its membership. He convincingly demonstrates that the faculty's jurisdiction and procedures were modelled on the pattern of a bishop and his cathedral canons. Gregory S. Moule's analysis of Pierre D'Ailly's Apologia confirms the faculty's jurisdiction and establishes that the censures of Denis Foulechat and John of Monteson were instances of judicial rather than fraternal correction. Medieval discussions of Judas Iscariot further clarify fraternal correction's role in the process of censure. Canon law, corporate theory, scholastic theology, and biblical commentary are employed to produce a wide-ranging, original, and thought-provoking study.
588			_aDescription based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
610	2	0	_aUniversité de Paris. _bFaculté de théologie _xHistory _yTo 1500.
650		0	_aChurch and college _zFrance _zParis _xHistory _yTo 1500.
650		0	_aAcademic freedom _zFrance _zParis _xHistory _yTo 1500.
650		0	_aEducation, Medieval _zFrance _zParis.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aMoule, Gregory S., author. _tCorporate jurisdiction, academic heresy, and fraternal correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 _dBoston : Brill, 2016 _z9789004311329 _w(DLC) 2015047326
830		0	_aEducation and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance _v51.
830		0	_aEuropean History and Culture E-Books Online, Collection 2015-I, ISBN: 9789004287419.
856	4		_zDOI: _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004311336
999			_c13979 _d13979