000			02888nam a2200433 i 4500
001			CR9781009293723
003			UkCbUP
005			20260610102056.0
007			cr||||||||||||
008			220421s2024||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781009293723 (ebook)
020			_z9781009293730 (hardback)
020			_z9781009293709 (paperback)
040			_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP
050	0	0	_aK3240 _b.B3595 2024
082	0	0	_a342.08/501 _223/eng/20240409
100	1		_aBambrick, Christina R, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aConstitutionalizing the private sphere : _ba comparative inquiry / _cChristina R Bambrick, University of Notre Dame.
264		1	_aCambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _c2024.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 306 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aCambridge studies in constitutional law
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 23 Jan 2025).
505	0		_aA Republican vein in liberal constitutionalism -- The United States : Equality along the public-private divide -- India : citizens' duties in aspiring to equality -- Germany : new tensions amid radiating values -- South Africa : toward societal transformation -- The European Union : republicanism in supranational context.
520			_aDo private actors have constitutional duties? While traditionally only government actors are responsible for upholding constitutional rights, courts and constitution-makers increasingly do assign constitutional duties to private actors as well. Therefore, a landlord may have constitutional duties to their tenants, and a sports club may even have duties to its fans. This book argues that this phenomenon of applying rights 'horizontally' can be understood through the lens of republican political theory. Themes echoing such concepts as the common good and civic duty from republican thought recur in discourses surrounding horizontal application. Bambrick traces republican themes in debates from the United States, India, Germany, South Africa, and the European Union. While these contexts have vastly different histories and aspirations, constitutional actors in each place have considered the horizontal application of rights and, in doing so, have made republican arguments.
650		0	_aConstitutional law _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aCivil rights _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aEquality before the law _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aRepublicanism _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aSocial change _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aLocal government.
650		0	_aCivil society.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _z9781009293730
830		0	_aCambridge studies in constitutional law.
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009293723
999			_c10242 _d10242