TY - BOOK AU - Mocombe,Paul TI - Liberal bourgeois Protestantism: the metaphysics of globalization T2 - Studies in critical social sciences SN - 9789004229952 AV - HM841 .M625 2012 U1 - 303.48/2 23 PY - 2012/// CY - Leiden, Boston PB - Brill KW - Globalization KW - Social aspects KW - Philosophy KW - Cultural fusion KW - United States KW - Capitalism KW - Americanization KW - African Americans KW - Cultural assimilation KW - Protestant work ethic KW - Hegemony N1 - Includes bibliographical references and index; Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- Globalization, Bourgeois Protestantism and Africans in America Globalization -- Liberal Bourgeois Protestantism -- The Historical Constitution of African American Consciousness in Globalization -- Hybrid Identities in Globalization The Historical Constitution of Grenadian Consciousness in Globalization -- W.E.B. Du Bois -- Barack Hussein Obama -- The “Others” in a World Economy -- Conclusion: What Is To Be Done? -- References -- Index; Available to subscribing member institutions only N2 - Sociological theory regarding the contemporary (1970s to the present) phenomenon of globalization focuses either on convergence or hybridization.The former, convergence, highlights the ever-increasing homogenization of cultures and societies around the globe via socioeconomic rational forces. From this perspective globalization is tantamount to Westernization or Americanization of other cultures and societies via neoliberal economic, market, subjugation. The latter, hybridization, emphasizes heterogeneity, the mixture of cultural forms out of the integration of society via globalizing processes stemming from improvements in information technology, communications, mass media, et cetera In this latter form, cultures and societies are not homogenized, but are cultural forms that are syncretized with liberal democratic Western capitalist rational organization. In this work, Mocombe synthesizes the two positions by suggesting that globalization under American hegemony are the same process, convergence, and that the only alternative to this thesis of convergence is Samuel P. Huntington’s (1996) differential hypothesis in which a clash of civilization are the result of eight intransigent cultural frameworks—Sinic, Japan, Hindu, Islamic, Orthodox, Western Europe, North America, and Africa—that dominate the globe. Refutating Huntington’s thesis, Mocombe suggests there are really only two opposing counter-hegemonic forces to the convergence towards Westernization or Americanization: the earth itself and Islamic Fundamentalist movements UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004229952 ER -