TY - BOOK AU - Sinkkonen,Ville TI - A comparative appraisal of normative power: the European Union, the United States and the January 25th, 2011 revolution in Egypt T2 - The Erik Castren Institute monographs on international law and human rights SN - 9789004297999 AV - DT107.87 .S593 2015 U1 - 962.05/5 23 PY - 2015///] CY - Leiden, The Netherlands PB - Brill/Nijhoff KW - Protests (Egypt : 2011-) KW - fast KW - Buddhism and politics KW - Diplomatic relations KW - Politics and government KW - Egypt KW - History KW - Political aspects KW - Protests, 2011- KW - 21st century KW - Foreign relations KW - European Union countries KW - Europe KW - United States N1 - Includes bibliographical references (p. 296-364) and index; Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- Insights from Social Constructivism -- Reinterpreting Normative Power -- A Three-Dimensional Framework for Analysing Normative Power -- Setting the Stage -- Dimension I: Norms and Identity -- Dimension II: Means -- Dimension III: Paradoxes -- Final Assessment: Diagnoses, Diseases and Relapses -- Epilogue -- Documents Used for the Analysis of Norms Promoted by the European Union (Table 6.1) -- Documents Used for the Analysis of Norms Promoted by the United States (Table 6.2) -- References -- Index; Available to subscribing member institutions only N2 - In A Comparative Appraisal of Normative Power Ville Sinkkonen constructs a three-pronged analytical framework for the analysis of normative power, a theoretical concept recently associated with studying the international role of the European Union. This toolkit allows him to compare the foreign policy conduct of the EU and the United States in the context of the January 25th, 2011 Revolution in Egypt along three dimensions: ‘norms and identity’, ‘means’ and ‘paradoxes’. These components permit an in-depth analysis of Western norm promotion in the midst of the upheaval, building on a large pool of source documents. The monograph broadens the remit of normative power through its empirical bent, comparative research set-up and focus on a swiftly unfolding revolution/transition complex. In the process, the prevalent discourse of the EU as a benign international actor is subjected to rigorous analytical scrutiny UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004297999 ER -