TY - BOOK AU - Sourgens,Frédéric Gilles TI - A nascent common law: the process of decisionmaking in international legal disputes between states and foreign investors T2 - International Litigation in Practice, SN - 9789004288201 AV - K2100 .S798 2015eb U1 - 346/.092 23 CY - Leiden, The Netherlands PB - Koninklijke Brill. KW - Judicial process KW - Common law KW - Jurisdiction (International law) KW - Procedure (Law) KW - fast KW - Electronic books N1 - Includes bibliographical references and index; Preliminary Material -- 1 Critical Mass: The Unique Role of Investor-State Arbitration in International Law -- 2 Theoretical Underpinnings of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 3 Stability of the Adjudicatory Framework -- 4 Iura Novit Curia -- 5 The Problem of Jurisdictional Judgment -- 6 Proof of Consent -- 7 Establishment of Jurisdictional Facts -- 8 The Inductive Process of Jurisdictional Decisionmaking -- 9 The Precedent Problem -- 10 Law as Process -- 11 The Common Law Solution -- 12 Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose -- Bibliography -- Index; Available to subscribing member institutions only N2 - In A Nascent Common Law: The Process of Decisionmaking in International Legal Disputes Between States and Foreign Investors Frédéric Gilles Sourgens submits that investor-state dispute resolution relies upon an inductive, common law decisionmaking process, which reveals a necessary plurality of first principles within investor-state dispute resolution. Relying upon, amongst others, Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, the book explains how this plurality of first principles does not devolve into arbitrary indeterminacy. A Nascent Common Law provides an alternative account to current theoretical conceptions of investor-state arbitration. It explains that these theories cannot adequately resolve a key empirical challenge: tribunals frequently reach facially inconsistent results on similar questions of law. Sourgens makes an inductive approach, focused on the manner of decisionmaking by tribunals in the context of specific records that can explain this inconsistency UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004288201 ER -