GHU Logo
The Great Heights University Library
Academic discovery, digital access, and research support

Opinion pooling / Lee Elkin, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Richard Pettigrew, University of Bristol.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextSeries: Cambridge elements. Elements in decision theory and philosophy,Publisher: Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2024Description: 1 online resource (96 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781009315203 (ebook)
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version: : No titleDDC classification:
  • 170 23/eng/20240808
LOC classification:
  • BD184 .E65 2024
Online resources:
Contents:
Philosophical motivations -- Desirable features of pooling strategies -- Opinion pooling strategies -- Promoting group epistemic rationality -- Promoting group practical rationality -- Relaxing some constraints.
Summary: Disagreement is a common feature of a social world. For various reasons, however, we sometimes need to resolve a disagreement into a single set of opinions. This can be achieved by pooling the opinions of individuals that make up the group. In this Element, we provide an opinionated survey on some ways of pooling opinions: linear pooling, multiplicative pooling (including geometric), and pooling through imprecise probabilities. While we give significant attention to the axiomatic approach in evaluating pooling strategies, we also evaluate them in terms of the epistemic and practical goals they might meet. In doing so, we connect opinion pooling to some philosophical problems in social epistemology and the philosophy of action, illuminating different perspectives one might take when figuring out how to pool opinions for a given purpose. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Jan 2025).

Philosophical motivations -- Desirable features of pooling strategies -- Opinion pooling strategies -- Promoting group epistemic rationality -- Promoting group practical rationality -- Relaxing some constraints.

Open Access. Unrestricted online access star

Disagreement is a common feature of a social world. For various reasons, however, we sometimes need to resolve a disagreement into a single set of opinions. This can be achieved by pooling the opinions of individuals that make up the group. In this Element, we provide an opinionated survey on some ways of pooling opinions: linear pooling, multiplicative pooling (including geometric), and pooling through imprecise probabilities. While we give significant attention to the axiomatic approach in evaluating pooling strategies, we also evaluate them in terms of the epistemic and practical goals they might meet. In doing so, we connect opinion pooling to some philosophical problems in social epistemology and the philosophy of action, illuminating different perspectives one might take when figuring out how to pool opinions for a given purpose. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.