GHU Logo
The Great Heights University Library
Academic discovery, digital access, and research support

Negotiating differences word, image and religion in the Dutch Republic / by Els Stronks.

By: Material type: TextSeries: Brill eBook titles 2011 | Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions ; 155. | European History and Culture E-Books Online, Collection 2011, ISBN: 9789004222878Publisher: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2011Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789004210639
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: No titleDDC classification:
  • 246.09492/0903 22
LOC classification:
  • BV153.N4 S77 2011
Online resources:
Contents:
Preliminary Material / E. Stronks -- Chapter One. Literature As Reflection Of Religious Identities / E. Stronks -- Chapter Two. Aspects Of Visual Culture: Word, Image And Religion / E. Stronks -- Chapter Three. Restrictions And Sensibilities, 1600–1630 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Four. Diverging Roads, 1630–1653 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Five. Windows Of Opportunity, 1653–1678 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Six. Appropriation, 1678–1725 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Seven. Annexation, 1725–1795 / E. Stronks -- Epilogue / E. Stronks -- Bibliography / E. Stronks -- Index / E. Stronks.
Summary: This book explores the dynamics of peaceful coexistence in the Dutch Republic by tracing the literary responses to one of the key controversies between Protestants and Catholics – the role of religious imagery in worship. Why and to what extent were people in the Republic willing to reconcile theological differences and combine elements from their own religious cultural practices with those of another? The intermingling of practices, the author shows, was unexpectedly complicated in the Republic. Restraints were imposed on the use of images in religious literature of all denominations till 1650. Evidence of negotiations appears after 1650, however, as Dutch Protestants absorbed significant aspects of Catholic visual traditions into their own. Religious toleration had clearly become a matter of sharing rather than enduring for the Protestants, but retained features of a monologue since Dutch Catholics were then developing a new, idiosyncratic identity of their own.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references (p. [305]-334) and index.

Preliminary Material / E. Stronks -- Chapter One. Literature As Reflection Of Religious Identities / E. Stronks -- Chapter Two. Aspects Of Visual Culture: Word, Image And Religion / E. Stronks -- Chapter Three. Restrictions And Sensibilities, 1600–1630 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Four. Diverging Roads, 1630–1653 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Five. Windows Of Opportunity, 1653–1678 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Six. Appropriation, 1678–1725 / E. Stronks -- Chapter Seven. Annexation, 1725–1795 / E. Stronks -- Epilogue / E. Stronks -- Bibliography / E. Stronks -- Index / E. Stronks.

Available to subscribing member institutions only.

This book explores the dynamics of peaceful coexistence in the Dutch Republic by tracing the literary responses to one of the key controversies between Protestants and Catholics – the role of religious imagery in worship. Why and to what extent were people in the Republic willing to reconcile theological differences and combine elements from their own religious cultural practices with those of another? The intermingling of practices, the author shows, was unexpectedly complicated in the Republic. Restraints were imposed on the use of images in religious literature of all denominations till 1650. Evidence of negotiations appears after 1650, however, as Dutch Protestants absorbed significant aspects of Catholic visual traditions into their own. Religious toleration had clearly become a matter of sharing rather than enduring for the Protestants, but retained features of a monologue since Dutch Catholics were then developing a new, idiosyncratic identity of their own.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.