GHU Logo
The Great Heights University Library
Academic discovery, digital access, and research support

Constitutional Comparison : Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States / François Venter.

By: Material type: TextSeries: Brill Book Archive Part 1, ISBN: 9789004472495Publisher: Leiden; Boston : Brill | Nijhoff, 2001Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789004481404
  • 9789041115102
Other title:
  • Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version:: Constitutional Comparison : Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States.DDC classification:
  • 342 23
LOC classification:
  • K3165
Online resources:
Contents:
Preface. -- Bibliography. -- Table of Cases. -- 1. Considerations of Comparative Methodology. -- 2. Predominance of the Constitution. -- 3. Constitutional Rights. -- 4. Democracy and the Distribution of Authority. -- 5. Comparing Constitutions in 2000. -- Index.
Summary: In our globalized era it has become impossible to deal effectively with constitutional law and related subjects such as fundamental rights, administrative law and political science without knowledge of foreign systems. A wealth of literature is available on practically all constitutional systems and the intricacies of their application. This, however, presents the constitutionalist with a formidable problem: Which foreign systems should I explore in order to make relevant comparisons, and how should I go about it? This book addresses the core problems of comparability and appropriate comparative methodology in the realm of contemporary constitutionalism. The outcome is, however, not mere theorizing. Most of the text is devoted to an incisive application of the chosen comparative method to four geographically, historically, and culturally divergent, but thoroughly comparable, constitutional systems. In the course of the comparative exercise, contemporary constitutional dogma and constitutional mechanics are analyzed and explained, in many instances in their historical contexts, making the book itself a useful source of comparative and historical information.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Preface. -- Bibliography. -- Table of Cases. -- 1. Considerations of Comparative Methodology. -- 2. Predominance of the Constitution. -- 3. Constitutional Rights. -- 4. Democracy and the Distribution of Authority. -- 5. Comparing Constitutions in 2000. -- Index.

In our globalized era it has become impossible to deal effectively with constitutional law and related subjects such as fundamental rights, administrative law and political science without knowledge of foreign systems. A wealth of literature is available on practically all constitutional systems and the intricacies of their application. This, however, presents the constitutionalist with a formidable problem: Which foreign systems should I explore in order to make relevant comparisons, and how should I go about it? This book addresses the core problems of comparability and appropriate comparative methodology in the realm of contemporary constitutionalism. The outcome is, however, not mere theorizing. Most of the text is devoted to an incisive application of the chosen comparative method to four geographically, historically, and culturally divergent, but thoroughly comparable, constitutional systems. In the course of the comparative exercise, contemporary constitutional dogma and constitutional mechanics are analyzed and explained, in many instances in their historical contexts, making the book itself a useful source of comparative and historical information.

Description based on print version record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.