Includes bibliographical references and index.

Preliminary Material -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Early History of the Faculty of Theology: Evidence for the Model of Bishop and Chapter in the Faculty -- 3 The Corporate Development of the Faculty of Theology -- 4 Jurisdiction and the Cathedral Chapter: Gratian and the Decretists -- 5 Jurisdiction of the Cathedral Chapter: Episcopus Nullius and Irrefragabili -- 6 Jurisdiction, Procedure, and the Censure of Academic Heresy in the Faculty of Theology -- 7 The Debate over the Jurisdiction of the Faculty of Theology -- 8 Judas, Monteson, and Fraternal Correction at Paris -- 9 Fraternal Correction and Its Role in Academic Censure at the University of Paris -- Conclusion -- Appendix A -- Select Bibliography -- Index of Legal Citations -- Index of Biblical Citations -- Index of Names and Subjects.

Available to subscribing member institutions only.

In Corporate Jurisdiction, Academic Heresy, and Fraternal Correction at the University of Paris, 1200-1400 , Gregory S. Moule explains how the theological faculty acquired independent jurisdiction over cases of academic heresy among its membership. He convincingly demonstrates that the faculty's jurisdiction and procedures were modelled on the pattern of a bishop and his cathedral canons. Gregory S. Moule's analysis of Pierre D'Ailly's Apologia confirms the faculty's jurisdiction and establishes that the censures of Denis Foulechat and John of Monteson were instances of judicial rather than fraternal correction. Medieval discussions of Judas Iscariot further clarify fraternal correction's role in the process of censure. Canon law, corporate theory, scholastic theology, and biblical commentary are employed to produce a wide-ranging, original, and thought-provoking study.

Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.