GHU Logo
The Great Heights University Library
Academic discovery, digital access, and research support

Environment Systems and Decisions [electronic resource] / edited by Otavio Jose Oliveira, Igor Linkov, James H. Lambert.

Contributor(s): Material type: Continuing resourcePublisher: New York : Springer US : Imprint: Springer.Description: online resourceISSN:
  • 2194-5411
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Printed version: : No titleOnline resources: Summary: Aims and Scope Environment Systems and Decisions (ENVR) publishes high-quality research that advances environmental management and tools, environmental and climate risk analysis, and decision-making in sociotechnical–environmental systems, as well as multidisciplinary research in which environmental considerations represent one of the central dimensions. The journal welcomes quantitative, qualitative, conceptual, and bibliometric studies addressing environmental issues. ENVR encourages contributions that address environmental systems and management, environmental regulation, and environmental and climate risk assessment, as well as specific management tools and methods, such as environmental impact assessment, life cycle assessment, environmental performance measurement, carbon footprint and emissions management, cleaner production, eco-design, circular economy, green supply chain management, and environmental management systems (e.g., ISO 14001). The journal also welcomes research addressing risk, resilience, and emergency readiness in environmental issues, and studies that explore the role of Industry 4.0 technologies and Industry 5.0 in supporting environmental management, monitoring, analysis, and decision-making. Multidisciplinary research adopting broader integrative perspectives, including sustainability, ESG, and integrated management systems, is also within the scope of the journal. Peer Review Policy All manuscripts submitted to Environment Systems and Decisions undergo a double-blind peer review process, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers, selected for their expertise in the subject area. A central evaluation criterion is the extent to which the manuscript offers robust scientific and applied contributions to environmental problems, in addition to originality, methodological soundness, and alignment with the journal’s aims and scope. .
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Aims and Scope Environment Systems and Decisions (ENVR) publishes high-quality research that advances environmental management and tools, environmental and climate risk analysis, and decision-making in sociotechnical–environmental systems, as well as multidisciplinary research in which environmental considerations represent one of the central dimensions. The journal welcomes quantitative, qualitative, conceptual, and bibliometric studies addressing environmental issues. ENVR encourages contributions that address environmental systems and management, environmental regulation, and environmental and climate risk assessment, as well as specific management tools and methods, such as environmental impact assessment, life cycle assessment, environmental performance measurement, carbon footprint and emissions management, cleaner production, eco-design, circular economy, green supply chain management, and environmental management systems (e.g., ISO 14001). The journal also welcomes research addressing risk, resilience, and emergency readiness in environmental issues, and studies that explore the role of Industry 4.0 technologies and Industry 5.0 in supporting environmental management, monitoring, analysis, and decision-making. Multidisciplinary research adopting broader integrative perspectives, including sustainability, ESG, and integrated management systems, is also within the scope of the journal. Peer Review Policy All manuscripts submitted to Environment Systems and Decisions undergo a double-blind peer review process, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers, selected for their expertise in the subject area. A central evaluation criterion is the extent to which the manuscript offers robust scientific and applied contributions to environmental problems, in addition to originality, methodological soundness, and alignment with the journal’s aims and scope. .

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.