GHU Logo
The Great Heights University Library
Academic discovery, digital access, and research support

The Migration of Metaphysics into the Realm of the Profane : Theodor W. Adorno Reads Gershom Scholem / Ansgar Martins.

By: Material type: TextSeries: IJS Studies in Judaica ; 20. | Early Modern History and Modern History E-Books Online, Collection 2020, ISBN: 9789004407398Publisher: Leiden; Boston : BRILL, 2020Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789004399068
  • 9789004399051
Other title:
  • Theodor W. Adorno Reads Gershom Scholem
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version:: The Migration of Metaphysics into the Realm of the Profane: Theodor W. Adorno Reads Gershom Scholem, DDC classification:
  • 901 23
LOC classification:
  • D16.8
Online resources: Summary: Ansgar Martins’s The Migration of Metaphysics into the Realm of the Profane is the first book-length study focusing on Adorno’s idiosyncratic appropriation of Jewish mysticism in the light of his relationship to Gershom Scholem and their shared intellectual contexts. Rather than merely posit vague associative connections, as previous authors have often done, Martins’s close reading of specific references in published and private texts alike allows him to highlight both commonalities and differences between Adorno’s and Scholem’s understanding of Kabbalistic tropes and the issue of metaphysics in the modern world, and to demonstrate the extent to which similarities resulted from mutual and/or third-party influences (especially Benjamin). Martins throws the specifics of their respective idiosyncratic appropriations of (Jewish) tradition into sharp relief.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Ansgar Martins’s The Migration of Metaphysics into the Realm of the Profane is the first book-length study focusing on Adorno’s idiosyncratic appropriation of Jewish mysticism in the light of his relationship to Gershom Scholem and their shared intellectual contexts. Rather than merely posit vague associative connections, as previous authors have often done, Martins’s close reading of specific references in published and private texts alike allows him to highlight both commonalities and differences between Adorno’s and Scholem’s understanding of Kabbalistic tropes and the issue of metaphysics in the modern world, and to demonstrate the extent to which similarities resulted from mutual and/or third-party influences (especially Benjamin). Martins throws the specifics of their respective idiosyncratic appropriations of (Jewish) tradition into sharp relief.

Description based on print version record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.