Methods and methodologies Aristotelian logic East and West, 500-1500 /
Methods and methodologies Aristotelian logic East and West, 500-1500 /
edited by Margaret Cameron and John Marenbon.
- 1 online resource.
- Brill eBook titles 2011 .
- Investigating Medieval Philosophy 2. European History and Culture E-Books Online, Collection 2011, ISBN: 9789004222878. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Preliminary Material / Methods And Methodologies: An Introduction / The ‘Ontologization’ Of Logic. Metaphysical Themes In Avicenna’s Reworking Of The Organon / Averroes And The Logical Status Of Metaphysics / Non Est Natura Sine Persona. The Issue Of Uninstantiated Universals From Late Antiquity To The Early Middle Ages / What Counted As Logic In The Thirteenth Century? / Two Summulae, Two Ways Of Doing Logic: Peter Of Spain’s ‘Realism’ And John Buridan’s ‘Nominalism’ / The Scope Of Logic: Soto And Fonseca On Dialectic And Informal Arguments / Interpreting Medieval Logic And In Medieval Logic / Is There A Medieval Mereology? / On Formalizing The Logics Of The Past / De Interpretatione 5–8: Aristotle, Boethius, And Abaelard On Propositionality / Bibliography / Indexes / M. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- Margaret Cameron -- Amos Bertolacci -- Matteo Di Giovanni -- Christophe Erismann -- Sten Ebbesen -- Gyula Klima -- E. Jennifer Ashworth -- Simo Knuuttila -- Andrew Arlig -- Paul Thom -- Christopher J. Martin -- M. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- M. Cameron and J. Marenbon.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
Methods and Methodologies explores two questions about studying the Aristotelian tradition of logic. The first, addressed by the chapters on methods in the first half of the book, is directly about the medieval logical commentaries, treatises and handbooks. How did medieval authors in the different traditions, Latin and Arabic, go about their work on Aristotelian logic? In particular, how did they themselves conceive the relationship between logic and other branches of philosophy and disciplines outside philosophy? The second question is about methodologies, the subject of the chapters in the second half of the book: it invites writers to reflect on their own and their colleagues’ practice as twenty-first century interpreters of this medieval writing on Aristotelian logic. Contributors are Sten Ebbesen, Christopher J. Martin, Christophe Erismann, Andrew Arlig, Simo Knuuttila, Amos Bertolacci, Jennifer Ashworth, Paul Thom, Gyula Klima, Matteo di Giovanni and Margaret Cameron.
9789004192058
10.1163/ej.9789004188853.i-246 DOI
2010041733
Aristotle--Congresses.
Logic, Medieval--Congresses.
Muslim logicians--Congresses.
BC34 / .M46 2011
160.92
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Preliminary Material / Methods And Methodologies: An Introduction / The ‘Ontologization’ Of Logic. Metaphysical Themes In Avicenna’s Reworking Of The Organon / Averroes And The Logical Status Of Metaphysics / Non Est Natura Sine Persona. The Issue Of Uninstantiated Universals From Late Antiquity To The Early Middle Ages / What Counted As Logic In The Thirteenth Century? / Two Summulae, Two Ways Of Doing Logic: Peter Of Spain’s ‘Realism’ And John Buridan’s ‘Nominalism’ / The Scope Of Logic: Soto And Fonseca On Dialectic And Informal Arguments / Interpreting Medieval Logic And In Medieval Logic / Is There A Medieval Mereology? / On Formalizing The Logics Of The Past / De Interpretatione 5–8: Aristotle, Boethius, And Abaelard On Propositionality / Bibliography / Indexes / M. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- Margaret Cameron -- Amos Bertolacci -- Matteo Di Giovanni -- Christophe Erismann -- Sten Ebbesen -- Gyula Klima -- E. Jennifer Ashworth -- Simo Knuuttila -- Andrew Arlig -- Paul Thom -- Christopher J. Martin -- M. Cameron and J. Marenbon -- M. Cameron and J. Marenbon.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
Methods and Methodologies explores two questions about studying the Aristotelian tradition of logic. The first, addressed by the chapters on methods in the first half of the book, is directly about the medieval logical commentaries, treatises and handbooks. How did medieval authors in the different traditions, Latin and Arabic, go about their work on Aristotelian logic? In particular, how did they themselves conceive the relationship between logic and other branches of philosophy and disciplines outside philosophy? The second question is about methodologies, the subject of the chapters in the second half of the book: it invites writers to reflect on their own and their colleagues’ practice as twenty-first century interpreters of this medieval writing on Aristotelian logic. Contributors are Sten Ebbesen, Christopher J. Martin, Christophe Erismann, Andrew Arlig, Simo Knuuttila, Amos Bertolacci, Jennifer Ashworth, Paul Thom, Gyula Klima, Matteo di Giovanni and Margaret Cameron.
9789004192058
10.1163/ej.9789004188853.i-246 DOI
2010041733
Aristotle--Congresses.
Logic, Medieval--Congresses.
Muslim logicians--Congresses.
BC34 / .M46 2011
160.92