Constitutionalisation of private law /
Constitutionalisation of private law /
by Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert Lindenbergh, editors.
- 1 online resource.
- Constitutional law library, 2 1871-4110 ; .
- Nijhoff eBook titles 2006 .
- Constitutional Law Library 2. International Law E-Books Online, Collection 2006, ISBN: 9789004222946. .
At head of title: E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Preliminary Material / 1 Fundamental Rights Talk an Enrichment of Legal Discourse in Private Law? / 2 Private Law and Fundamental Rights: a Sceptical View / 3 Some Thoughts on the Impact of Fundamental Rights on Dutch Company Law / 4 Applicability Of Fundamental Rights In Private Law: What Is The Legislature To Do? an Intermezzo from a Constitutional Point of View / 5 Constitutionalisation of Private Law: the European Convention on Human Rights Perspective / 6 Constitutionalisation of Private Law - the German Perspective / 7 The Constitutionalisation of Private Law in the Uk: Is There an Emperor inside the New Clothes? / 8 The Constitutionalisation of Private Lawin the Netherlands / Contributors / Index / Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg -- Hans Nieuwenhuis -- Jan Smits -- Vino Timmerman -- Wim Voermans -- Tom Barkhuysen and Michiel Van Emmerik -- Gert Brggemeier -- Stathis Banakas -- Siewert Lindenbergh -- Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg -- Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
All over Europe we witness a spectacular rise of the recourse to fundamental rights in debates on civil liability. This is part of a pervasive process of constitutionalisation, of private law in general and tort law in particular. This publication aims at establishing a clear analysis of the nature and growth of the C-factor (C for constitutionalisation) in Germany, France, the UK and The Netherlands. This analysis will be followed by answering the questions: How are these developments to be judged? Does the C-factor seriously undermine the autonomy of private law (‘The purpose of private law is simply to be private law’, Ernest J. Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law )? And if so, does it matter? How are we to handle the C-factor? Should we embrace it wholeheartedly, or rather adopt a policy of being neglect or even try to eradicate it altogether?
9789047418443
10.1163/ej.9789004148529.i-136 DOI
2006284705
B0610631 bccb
Privaatrecht.
Droit civil--Europe--Congrès.
Droits de l'homme--Europe--Congrès.
Civil law--Europe--Congresses.
Civil rights--Europe--Congresses.
Duitsland.
Nederland.
Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland.
KJC984.8 / .C66 2006
341.24048
At head of title: E.M. Meijers Institute of Legal Studies.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Preliminary Material / 1 Fundamental Rights Talk an Enrichment of Legal Discourse in Private Law? / 2 Private Law and Fundamental Rights: a Sceptical View / 3 Some Thoughts on the Impact of Fundamental Rights on Dutch Company Law / 4 Applicability Of Fundamental Rights In Private Law: What Is The Legislature To Do? an Intermezzo from a Constitutional Point of View / 5 Constitutionalisation of Private Law: the European Convention on Human Rights Perspective / 6 Constitutionalisation of Private Law - the German Perspective / 7 The Constitutionalisation of Private Law in the Uk: Is There an Emperor inside the New Clothes? / 8 The Constitutionalisation of Private Lawin the Netherlands / Contributors / Index / Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg -- Hans Nieuwenhuis -- Jan Smits -- Vino Timmerman -- Wim Voermans -- Tom Barkhuysen and Michiel Van Emmerik -- Gert Brggemeier -- Stathis Banakas -- Siewert Lindenbergh -- Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg -- Tom Barkhuysen and Siewert D. Lindenberg.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
All over Europe we witness a spectacular rise of the recourse to fundamental rights in debates on civil liability. This is part of a pervasive process of constitutionalisation, of private law in general and tort law in particular. This publication aims at establishing a clear analysis of the nature and growth of the C-factor (C for constitutionalisation) in Germany, France, the UK and The Netherlands. This analysis will be followed by answering the questions: How are these developments to be judged? Does the C-factor seriously undermine the autonomy of private law (‘The purpose of private law is simply to be private law’, Ernest J. Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law )? And if so, does it matter? How are we to handle the C-factor? Should we embrace it wholeheartedly, or rather adopt a policy of being neglect or even try to eradicate it altogether?
9789047418443
10.1163/ej.9789004148529.i-136 DOI
2006284705
B0610631 bccb
Privaatrecht.
Droit civil--Europe--Congrès.
Droits de l'homme--Europe--Congrès.
Civil law--Europe--Congresses.
Civil rights--Europe--Congresses.
Duitsland.
Nederland.
Verenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannië en Noord-Ierland.
KJC984.8 / .C66 2006
341.24048