Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Banez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited /
Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Banez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited /
edited by R.J. Matava.
- 1 online resource.
- Brill's studies in intellectual history, v. 252 0920-8607 ; .
- Brill's Studies in Intellectual History 252. Brill's Studies in Intellectual History Online, Supplement 2016, ISBN: 9789004309685. .
Includes bibliographical references.
Preliminary Material / Prologue / 1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis / 2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice / 3 Domingo Báñez’s Critique of Molina / 4 Luis de Molina’s Critique of Báñez / 5 Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan / 6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas / 7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense / Epilogue / Select Bibliography / Index / R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
In Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez’s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.
9789004310315
10.1163/9789004310315 DOI
2015045722
Báñez, Domingo, 1528-1604.
Catholic Church--Doctrines--History.
Free will and determinism--Religious aspects--Catholic Church.
Molinism.
BT810.3
233/.7
Includes bibliographical references.
Preliminary Material / Prologue / 1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis / 2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice / 3 Domingo Báñez’s Critique of Molina / 4 Luis de Molina’s Critique of Báñez / 5 Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan / 6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas / 7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense / Epilogue / Select Bibliography / Index / R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava -- R.J. Matava.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
In Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez’s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.
9789004310315
10.1163/9789004310315 DOI
2015045722
Báñez, Domingo, 1528-1604.
Catholic Church--Doctrines--History.
Free will and determinism--Religious aspects--Catholic Church.
Molinism.
BT810.3
233/.7