Best practices for human rights and humanitarian NGO fact-finding / by Gerald M. Steinberg, Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman.
Material type:
TextSeries: Nijhoff Law Specials ; 78. | Human Rights and Humanitarian Law E-Books Online, Collection 2012, ISBN: 9789004223264Publisher: Leiden ; Boston : M. Nijhoff Publishers, 2012Description: 1 online resource (viii, 212 pages)Content type: - text
- computer
- online resource
- 9789004218123
- 341.4/8 23
- K3240 .S74 2012
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Preliminary Material / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Introduction / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- The Need for Standardized Fact-Finding Methodology / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Guidelines for NGOs / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Fact-Finding Case Studies / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Analysis and Conclusions / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Appendices / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Bibliography / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman -- Index / Gerald M. Steinberg , Anne Herzberg and Jordan Berman.
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
This work outlines available resources and proposed standards for international NGO fact-finding missions: Chapter One presents an introduction to the issue of NGO fact-finding. Chapter Two discusses the problems caused by the lack of any generally-accepted guidelines for NGO fact-finding, in contrast with contexts where NGOs have achieved consensus. Chapter Three surveys proposed guidelines for human rights and humanitarian NGOs. In addition, this section examines United Nations fact-finding standards, as well as examples of internal fact-finding standards for major NGOs. Chapter Four analyzes the fact-finding standards used in five specific cases: the International Crisis Group (Kosovo, 1999), the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (Georgia, 2008), United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Mapping Exercise on the Democratic Republic of Congo (1993-2003), Conflict Analysis Resource Center/University London study on Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (Colombia, 1988-2004), and Human Rights Watch (Lebanon, 2006). The final chapter offers conclusions and recommendations.
There are no comments on this title.